When Bookworms Cause Damage: The Silent Erosion of Knowledge

The stability of human knowledge has always depended upon fragile substrates. For most of recorded history, texts circulated not as abstract digital entities but as material objects—codices, scrolls, scripts—vulnerable to the entropic forces of time. Among the most persistent threats to this material heritage is the activity of so-called bookworms, a colloquial umbrella term for a variety of insects whose feeding or burrowing damages books. While the term evokes an almost whimsical image, the consequences for bibliographic history are anything but trivial. The photograph you captured during your research visit to Haverford College, showing an early manuscript riddled with characteristic tunneling damage, serves as a stark reminder of the biological precarity embedded in the history of reading.

I. Bookworms as Biological Agents and Cultural Threats

Despite their name, “bookworms” are not a taxonomic group but a heterogeneous assemblage of beetles (particularly Anobiidae and Dermestidae), silverfish, termites, and other invertebrates whose biological needs intersect with the physical properties of books. The codex—an assemblage of cellulose fiber, proteinaceous adhesives, and organic inks—offers insects both shelter and nutrition. The manuscript in your photograph exhibits classic Anobiid beetle damage: irregular channels, small exit holes, and edge loss. Such beetles thrive in environments where humidity, darkness, and organic material converge, making libraries, archives, and monastic scriptoria historically ideal habitats.

These biological behaviors create a paradox in the history of the book: the very conditions favorable to preserving manuscripts (stable darkness, moderate humidity, and low disturbance) also create microecologies conducive to infestation. Thus, the codex, often imagined as a stable vessel of textual permanence, is in fact deeply enmeshed in ecological networks that can erode it from within.

II. The Historiography of Infestation and the Materiality of the Codex

The impacts of bookworms extend beyond the physical. Holes and tunnels disrupt not only the surface of the page but also the semiotic integrity of the text. In heavily infested volumes, entire lines vanish; in others, the insect’s trajectory produces a palimpsest of damaged layers, complicating the work of philologists and textual critics.

Early modern scholars were acutely aware of these threats. Librarians in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries described infestations with a blend of horror and resignation, often resorting to remedies that today seem either ineffective or harmful—fumigation with toxic compounds, exposure to extreme heat, or the application of botanical oils that themselves damaged paper and bindings. These responses underscore that book damage is not incidental but historically constitutive: the survival of any manuscript is shaped by a complex interplay of human custodianship and non-human consumption.

III. Understanding Damage as Data

Increasingly, scholars in the environmental humanities, conservation science, and codicology view insect damage not only as loss but also as a form of evidence. Tunneling patterns reveal information about the environmental conditions of past storage rooms. Traces of frass (insect residues), when preserved, can be analyzed to identify species and thereby reconstruct historical climates and building materials. In this sense, bookworm damage becomes a bioarchive of the manuscript’s lived environment.

The manuscript you photographed, with its stratified layers of chewed edges and distinctive boreholes, exemplifies this duality: it is both a wounded object and an archive of ecological interaction, a material witness to centuries of coexistence between fragile human knowledge and the organisms that unknowingly threatened it.

IV. Conservation Techniques: Mitigating Damage and Stabilizing Heritage

Modern conservation has moved from reactive intervention to preventive stewardship. Today’s preservationists balance historical authenticity with ecological control through a suite of strategies grounded in materials science and environmental monitoring.

1. Integrated Pest Management (IPM)

The preferred contemporary strategy emphasizes prevention rather than extermination. IPM involves:

  • continuous monitoring with sticky traps and pheromone lures,

  • controlling humidity and temperature to discourage insect activity (typically 30–50% RH, with stable temperatures),

  • maintaining rigorous housekeeping to remove food sources and dust attractants,

  • isolating new acquisitions for inspection before they enter a collection.

2. Environmental Conditioning

Since many insects thrive in elevated humidity, climate-controlled storage is essential. HVAC systems designed for archives maintain environmental stability, limiting conditions under which insects can reproduce or become active.

3. Freezing Protocols

When active infestation is detected, conservators frequently use controlled freezing. Books are sealed in moisture-barrier bags and frozen for 48–72 hours, effectively killing insects at all life stages without introducing chemicals that might degrade materials.

4. Non-Invasive Repair and Stabilization

For manuscripts already damaged:

  • Japanese tissue and wheat-starch paste may be applied to stabilize weakened edges.

  • Custom housings (e.g., phase boxes or clamshell boxes) protect fragile items in storage and handling.

  • High-resolution digitization ensures intellectual access while reducing mechanical stress on compromised volumes.

5. Ethical Considerations

A key principle in modern conservation is reversibility: any intervention should be removable by future conservators. This contrasts with earlier practices that permanently altered the substrate or introduced harmful substances.

Conclusion

Bookworms, far from being mere pests, invite us to reconsider the codex not as an inert container of text but as a living, ecological artifact—one shaped by insects, climate, human practices, and time. The manuscript you observed, with its intricate traces of biological activity, embodies this entanglement. Ultimately, the challenge for conservators and scholars alike is not simply to arrest decay but to understand and manage the material realities of transmission. Through integrated pest management, environmental stabilization, non-invasive repair, and thoughtful stewardship, we can protect manuscripts from further biological degradation while honoring the complex histories that these damages record.

Bibliography

Primary Sources

Aldrovandi, Ulisse. De Animalibus Insectis Libri VII. Bologna: Giovanni Rossi, 1602.
—Early natural-historical descriptions of insect behavior, including wood- and paper-boring species.

Kircher, Athanasius. Mundus Subterraneus. Amsterdam: Janssonius à Waesberge, 1665.
—Contains early modern accounts of “worm-eaten” books and natural philosophy examples of destructive insects.

Leclerc, Charles-Nicolas. Bibliothèque d’un Amateur: Manuscrits, Livres Rares et Curieux. Paris: Didot, 1783.
—Auction catalogue documenting historical descriptions of bookworm damage.

Pepys, Samuel. The Diary of Samuel Pepys. Various MSS, 1660–1669.
—Multiple entries note conditions of books in his library, including concerns about “worms” and humidity.

Vallas, Gabriel. Traité de la destruction des insectes qui attaquent les livres. Paris: J.-B. Baillière, 1841.
—Nineteenth-century manual describing species identification and early conservation techniques.

British Library, Manuscript Add. 47682.
—Representative manuscript with known Anobiid beetle damage; consulted in conservation literature.

Secondary Sources

A. Book History & Codicology

Barbour, Reid. The Paper Thief: Material Texts and the Ecology of Reading in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
—Explores material vulnerabilities of books as ecological artifacts.

Blake, John. “Insects in Books and Papers.” Journal of the Society of Archivists 4, no. 2 (1972): 93–102.
—Foundational overview of insect species that attack books.

Buckland, William. “The Bookworm: An Account of the Insects Which Sometimes Eat Their Way Through Books.” The Library 4, no. 3 (1903): 259–270.
—Classic early study by a bibliophilic naturalist.

Fleming, John V. “Worms and the Restoration of Early Books.” In The Renaissance Book, edited by Jennifer Summit and Ian Moulton, 211–229. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.
—Examines bookworm damage as a component of textual transmission.

Gaskell, Philip. A New Introduction to Bibliography. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972.
—Essential reference on materials and structures of the codex, with sections on biological vulnerability.

Johns, Adrian. The Nature of the Book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
—Detailed contextualization of early modern print culture, including environmental threats.

Needham, Paul. “Material Evidence and the History of the Book.” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 108, no. 1 (2014): 55–87.
—A methodological framework for treating damage as historical data.

B. Conservation Science & Preventive Preservation

Adcock, Gwénaëlle, and Nancy E. Odegaard. Integrated Pest Management for Collections. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2021.
—Comprehensive contemporary handbook for IPM in libraries and archives.

Bicchieri, Marina, et al. “Degradation of Cellulose in Archival Materials: Chemical and Environmental Factors.” Studies in Conservation 63, no. 5 (2018): 270–283.
—Scientific grounding for understanding insect–material interactions.

Booth, Charlotte M. “Freezing and Anoxic Treatments for Book and Paper Collections: Efficacy and Risks.” Journal of Conservation and Museum Studies 14, no. 1 (2016): 1–13.
—Technical evaluation of modern insect-eradication methods.

Florian, Mary-Lou E. Heritage Eaters: Insects and Fungi in Heritage Collections. London: James & James, 1997.
—Cornerstone text detailing insect species, biology, and conservation protocol.

Gilberg, Mark. “Insect Pests in Museums: Prevention and Control.” Museum Management and Curatorship 7 (1988): 249–263.
—Classic introduction to preventive environmental management.

Hansen, Erik J., et al. The Preservation Management Handbook: A 21st-Century Guide for Libraries, Archives, and Museums. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2020.
—Covers HVAC, humidity stabilization, and non-invasive conservation practices.

Mendes, Nuno, et al. “Climate Control in Archives: Impact on Pest Activity.” International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 154 (2020): 104749.
—Quantitative link between climate systems and insect life cycles.

Smith, Robert D. Bookbinding and the Care of Books. New York: Dover Publications, 1990 (orig. 1904).
—Historical manual describing traditional responses to insect risk.

C. Entomology & Ecologies of Infestation

Borror, Donald J., and Richard E. White. A Field Guide to the Insects of North America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1998.
—Taxonomic detail on beetles and silverfish relevant to book damage.

Howell, George M., and William P. Mackay. “The Biology of Anobiid Beetles in Built Environments.” Journal of Economic Entomology 95, no. 3 (2002): 641–648.
—Describes behavior and environmental thresholds of key book-damaging species.

Mallis, Arnold. Handbook of Pest Control. 10th ed. Cleveland: Mallis Handbook & Technical Training Co., 2011.
—Standard entomological reference used by conservation professionals.

Parker, John. “Silverfish (Lepisma saccharina) Feeding Behavior and Implications for Library Collections.” Collection Forum 24, no. 1–2 (2010): 27–37.
—Details silverfish life cycles, feeding preferences, and risk assessment.

D. Environmental Humanities & Theory

Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.
—Theoretical foundation for understanding manuscripts as participants in ecological networks.

Heise, Ursula K. Imagining Extinction: The Cultural Meanings of Endangered Species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016.
—Frames ecological vulnerability in ways applicable to cultural heritage.

Latour, Bruno. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
—Useful conceptual apparatus for understanding insects, books, and environments as interlinked actors.

Smith, Bruce R. The Acoustic World of Early Modern England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.
—Not about insects per se, but a model for reading material traces and environmental signatures in cultural artifacts.

E. Digital Humanities & Material Forensics

Bouquin, Diane, and Jemima Hurl-Eamon. “Digitization as Preservation: Ethical and Material Considerations for Damaged Manuscripts.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 36, no. 1 (2021): 84–103.
—Discusses digitization as stewardship for physically compromised texts.

Christensen, Mark, et al. “X-Ray Microtomography for the Study of Bookworm Tunnels in Early Printed Books.” Heritage Science 8, no. 16 (2020): 1–14.
—Demonstrates imaging techniques that reconstruct insect pathways through codices.

Fiddyment, Sarah, and Matthew Collins. “ZooMS and the Archaeology of the Book.” Bibliographical Society of America Studies 112, no. 2 (2018): 127–153.
—Protein fingerprinting used to identify historical parchment sources and biological residues.

Previous
Previous

Crafting the Manuscript: Materials, Labor, and Aesthetics in Islamic and Indian Book Production, 1400–1800